Resources: Employment

  • Supreme Court of Canada Creates New Contract Law Duty: Duty of Honest Performance

    March 2015

    by Danielle Scorda

    In another recent decision of the SCC, Bhasin v Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71, the Court recognized a new common law contractual duty: the duty of honest performance.

    Read More +

    Supreme Court of Canada Creates New Contract Law Duty: Duty of Honest Performance
  • Beware The Administrative Suspension with Pay! It May Result in a Successful Constructive Dismissal Claim

    March 2015

    by Julie Menten

    In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada – Potter v. New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission, 2015 SCC 10 – the majority concluded that where the terms of an employment contract do not include the authority to place an employee on administrative suspension and…

    Read More +

    Beware The Administrative Suspension with Pay! It May Result in a Successful Constructive Dismissal Claim
  • Major Clarification in Law around Dismissal of Non-Union, Federally Regulated Employees: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, 2015 FCA 17

    March 2015

    The Federal Court of Appeal recently clarified that without cause dismissals of employees covered by the Canada Labour Code (the “Canada Code”), such as those working in banking, broadcasting, telecommunications and the railways, are not automatically “unjust” simply by virtue of the fact that no cause is asserted.

    Read More +

    Major Clarification in Law around Dismissal of Non-Union, Federally Regulated Employees: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, 2015 FCA 17
  • Drafting Employment Contracts: Avoiding Surprise and Liability

    February 2015

    by Ryan Copeland

    If drafted properly, employment agreements can go a long way towards mitigating potential employer liability upon termination. However, if contracts are drafted poorly, or not drafted at all, employers may be left with nothing more than a false sense of security.

    Read More +

    Drafting Employment Contracts: Avoiding Surprise and Liability
  • Being Clear about Contractual Rights and Obligations Benefits Employers

    October 2015

    by Thomas A. Roper K.C.Sarah Chamberlain (Dickson)

    A recent case out of Ontario demonstrates the importance of incorporating precise, unequivocal terms in an employment contract. In Kielb v. National Money Mart Co., 2015 ONSC 3790, the defendant employer successfully relied on clear contractual language in order to exclude the payment of a bonus at the time of termination of employment.

    Read More +

    Being Clear about Contractual Rights and Obligations Benefits Employers
  • Let’s Go Find the Wrong Person – The Costs of Terminating a Recruited Employee

    January 2015

    by Jennifer Hogan

    In a recent decision, Rodgers v. CEVA, 2014 ONSC 6583, an Ontario employer paid a high price for terminating a senior employee who had been recruited with an attractive job offer.

    Read More +

    Let’s Go Find the Wrong Person – The Costs of Terminating a Recruited Employee
  • “Physical Disability” Defined – A Critical Threshold Question

    January 2015

    by Michael Wagner

    Human rights statutes across Canada prohibit discrimination in employment on the basis of, among other things, “physical disability”. Sometimes it is clear that an employee is physically disabled, and entitled to statutory protection. However, there are other times when it is unclear if an employee’s medical circumstances fit the definition.

    Read More +

    “Physical Disability” Defined – A Critical Threshold Question
  • Establishing Undue Hardship Is Possible: Wilcox v. University of British Columbia and others, 2014 BCHRT 228

    December 2014

    by Jennifer Devins

    A recent decision of the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal, Wilcox v. University of British Columbia and others, 2014 BCHRT 228, demonstrates that undue hardship is not an impossible threshold to meet, even for a large and diverse employer such as a university.

    Read More +

    Establishing Undue Hardship Is Possible: Wilcox v. University of British Columbia and others, 2014 BCHRT 228
  • Do You Speak My Language? Language Proficiency as a Potentially Unforeseen Human Rights Risk

    December 2014

    by Gavin Marshall

    Many employers which have business operations that require a high and proficient level of communication struggle with the English language abilities of their employees.

    Read More +

    Do You Speak My Language? Language Proficiency as a Potentially Unforeseen Human Rights Risk
  • Expensive Secret Telling: When Damages May Be Available for Breach of a Confidentiality Clause in a Settlement Agreement

    November 2014

    by Sandra Guarascio

    Employers often enter into settlements in order to avoid litigation. Sometimes, the confidentiality of the settlement is crucially important to the employer. While simple confidentiality clauses are often included in settlement terms and coupled with enforcement mechanisms (what happens if a breach occurs), it is uncommon to see cases that address..

    Read More +

    Expensive Secret Telling: When Damages May Be Available for Breach of a Confidentiality Clause in a Settlement Agreement