Resources: Health + Safety

Too Little, Too Late: Just Cause Termination for Non-Culpable Absenteeism After Employer’s Repeated Requests for Medical Evidence Went Largely Unanswered

In District of Sparwoood v. CUPE, Local 2968 (P. Schafer Dismissal) (February 28, 2025), Arbitrator Ken Saunders upheld the just cause discharge of an employee who had been absent from work for over three years on a medical leave and failed to provide clear, current and credible medical evidence about his current and future ability to return to work, notwithstanding repeated requests.

Read More +

Too Little, Too Late: Just Cause Termination for Non-Culpable Absenteeism After Employer’s Repeated Requests for Medical Evidence Went Largely Unanswered

Confirming the Historic Trade-Off: A Worker’s Civil Action is Statute-Barred When Injury Arose Out of and In the Course of Employment

Workers’ compensation is a no-fault insurance system for injuries arising out of and in the course of a worker’s employment.  Insurance systems of this kind are provincially, federally and territorially mandated through legislation. Read more on a decision involving a respondent who was injured by a falling crate of tiles.

Read More +

Confirming the Historic Trade-Off: A Worker’s Civil Action is Statute-Barred When Injury Arose Out of and In the Course of Employment

Bill 11, Employment Standards Amendment Act: BC Government to Restrict Employer’s Ability to Request Health Practitioner Notes for Employee Health, Illness, or Injury Related Leave

In April 2025, the BC Legislature introduced Bill 11, Employment Standards Amendment Act. Bill 11 passed third reading on May 12, 2025. Bill 11 will amend the Employment Standards Act (the “ESA”) to prohibit employers from requiring employees to provide a note or other documentation from a health practitioner in relation to a health, illness, or injury related leave.

Read More +

Bill 11, Employment Standards Amendment Act: BC Government to Restrict Employer’s Ability to Request Health Practitioner Notes for Employee Health, Illness, or Injury Related Leave

Employee Discharged for Lying to His Doctor and Employer

In Brewers Distributors Ltd v. Brewery, Winery and Distillery Workers, Service Employees International Union, Local 2, Branch Local 300 (Banwait Grievance), [2024] B.C.C.A.A.A. No. 115 (Sullivan), Arbitrator Christopher Sullivan agreed that the employer had just and reasonable cause to discharge the grievor from employment after he was untruthful about his medical restrictions.

Read More +

Employee Discharged for Lying to His Doctor and Employer

Workplace Psychological Claims – BC Supreme Court Narrows the “Labour Relations Exclusion”

On March 6, 2025, the BC Supreme Court released an important and lengthy decision regarding workplace psychological claims. This trial decision addresses the second part of James Pickering’s action for benefits under the Workers Compensation Act, R.S.B.C. 2019, c. 1 [WCA].  The first part of this proceeding, indexed as Pickering v. School District No. 38 (Richmond), 2021 BCSC 1497, was a judicial review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal (“WCAT”).

At trial, Mr. Pickering argued that two provisions of the WCA infringe his rights under s. 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.), 1982, c. 11 [Charter]. He said that those provisions, in combination, led to the denial of his mental disorder claim for workers’ compensation. In short, he argued that his claim was denied for reasons that are discriminatory.

Read More +

Workplace Psychological Claims – BC Supreme Court Narrows the “Labour Relations Exclusion”

Health Spending Accounts Not Sufficient to Meet ESA Sick Leave Requirements

A British Columbia arbitral decision is the most recent in a developing line of authority cautioning BC employers that sick days conferred under the Employment Standards Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 113 (the “ESA”) may be qualitatively different than sick leave benefits under a collective agreement.

Read More +

Health Spending Accounts Not Sufficient to Meet ESA Sick Leave Requirements

Update on Five Paid Sick Days Under Employment Standards Act

The New Year brought employers in British Columbia a requirement to provide their employees with five paid sick (illness or injury) days. Since the requirement came into effect on January 1, 2022, we have been fielding questions about the implementation of the five paid sick days in the workplace. Below we highlight some of our more frequently asked questions.

Read More +

Update on Five Paid Sick Days Under Employment Standards Act

Arbitrators Consider Vaccination Policies

In the past few weeks, arbitrators have begun to issue decisions considering the reasonableness of COVID-19 vaccination policies in unionized workplaces. The following three decisions out of Ontario provide some key takeaways for employers.

Read More +

Arbitrators Consider Vaccination Policies

ESA: Five Days Paid Personal Illness or Injury (Sick) Leave, as of January 1, 2022

On May 28, 2021 we issued an update regarding Bill 13 Employment Standards Amendment Act (No. 2), 2021 (“Bill 13”), which amended the British Columbia Employment Standards Act (the “ESA”).  Bill 13 added temporary paid COVID leave (ending December 31, 2021) and added paid leave for personal illness or injury commencing January 1, 2022 (“Paid Sick Leave”), with the amount of days to be determined.

Read More +

ESA: Five Days Paid Personal Illness or Injury (Sick) Leave, as of January 1, 2022

Vaccination Status and the “New Normal”

As governments and businesses seek to avoid closures that have so heavily impacted the economy and everyday life, many are looking to vaccine passports and/or considering mandatory vaccination in the workplace to facilitate a return to “normal” operations.

Read More +

Vaccination Status and the “New Normal”