Resources: Human Rights

  • Clarification to Law of Employee Surveillance

    March 2, 2022

    by Kate DueckJordan Michaux

    Elevator law, according to one colleague and despite our best attempts to intervene, has its ups and downs. It has a unique set of characteristics, including its own elevator union (the International Union of Elevator Constructors (IUEC)), industry-specific collective agreements and a workforce of largely independent technicians.

    Read More +

    Clarification to Law of Employee Surveillance
  • Taking Away Important Responsibilities for Misconduct: Arbitrator Substitutes Permanent Disciplinary Demotion for Discharge

    February 18, 2022

    by Bobby Sangha

    When considering potential discipline for poor performance, a novel labour arbitration decision suggests a demotion – a permanent disciplinary demotion – may be an appropriate response.

    Read More +

    Taking Away Important Responsibilities for Misconduct: Arbitrator Substitutes Permanent Disciplinary Demotion for Discharge
  • Labour Law in the Time of Cholera

    February 7, 2022

    by Kate DueckMike Hamata

    2020 was full of surprises, and 2021 continued to bring new challenges for the profession. Our corner of toil in the legal vineyards was not immune. For labour and employment lawyers, 2021 at times felt like a treadmill of legislative change, workplace vaccination policies (do not call it a mandate unless employers are forcibly injecting employees…), and helping employers plan to keep their workplaces safe.

    Read More +

    Labour Law in the Time of Cholera
  • No More Tolerance for Covert Discrimination

    January 11, 2022

    by Kate Jones

    Cybulsky v. Hamilton Health Sciences, [2021] O.H.R.T.D. No. 209 (Letheren) is a boundary-pushing case that shows a growing intolerance for sex or gender discrimination in the workplace, including covert sex or gender discrimination.

    Read More +

    No More Tolerance for Covert Discrimination
  • BC Human Rights Tribunal Confirms that the Duty to Accommodate Does Not Extend to Providing Employees with Unproductive Work

    December 8, 2021

    by Gabrielle Berron-Styan

    In Kelly v. Saputo Dairy Products Canada, 2021 BCHRT 128, the BC Human Rights Tribunal dismissed a complaint made by a former employee claiming that his employer failed to take adequate steps to accommodate his disability.

    Read More +

    BC Human Rights Tribunal Confirms that the Duty to Accommodate Does Not Extend to Providing Employees with Unproductive Work
  • Arbitrators Consider Vaccination Policies

    December 7, 2021

    by Kate DueckChristopher Munroe

    In the past few weeks, arbitrators have begun to issue decisions considering the reasonableness of COVID-19 vaccination policies in unionized workplaces. The following three decisions out of Ontario provide some key takeaways for employers.

    Read More +

    Arbitrators Consider Vaccination Policies
  • Gender Identity + Expression

    November 15, 2021

    by Alissa DemerseNimrit K. Sian

    On October 28, my colleague Alissa Demerse and I presented on a very important topic in today’s climate: Gender Identity and Expression. In this webinar, we provided an overview of the topic, reviewed a number of key cases and outlined “do’s and do not’s” for employers. Here is a summary.

    Read More +

    Gender Identity + Expression
  • BC Labour Relations Board Finds No Anti-Union Animus in Discharge of 30-Year Employee During Organizing Drive

    October 18, 2021

    by James D. Kondopulos

    In Re RMC Ready-Mix Ltd., 2021 BCLRB 99, Vice-Chair Andres Barker of the BC Labour Relations Board held that the discharge of a 30-year employee (“the Employee”) did not amount to an unfair labour practice under the Labour Relations Code as alleged by the union.

    Read More +

    BC Labour Relations Board Finds No Anti-Union Animus in Discharge of 30-Year Employee During Organizing Drive
  • “Proud” Employee Awarded Half a Year of Notice and Aggravated Damages After Just Two Months of Work

    October 6, 2021

    by Christopher Munroe

    Shahram Younesi knew something was not right when he walked into a meeting and his managers were standing up.  They proceeded to terminate his employment after just two months of work.  When he asked why, he was told that he was not a competent engineer or a good manager, and that he embarrassed the company.  He was offered one month of pay in lieu of notice and asked to immediately sign a letter to confirm his acceptance of those terms.  He refused and ultimately sued.

    Read More +

    “Proud” Employee Awarded Half a Year of Notice and Aggravated Damages After Just Two Months of Work
  • Labour Protections Apply Even in Cases of Blatant Racism

    September 27, 2021

    by Andrew Nicholl

    In early July 2021, an employee of Coca Cola (the “Grievor” and “Employer” respectively) was discharged from employment for wearing a bandana with the Confederate flag and the words “The South Will Rise Again” printed on it.

    Read More +

    Labour Protections Apply Even in Cases of Blatant Racism
  • 1 3 4 5 6 7 13