Resources: Human Rights

  • Protection from Patrons: Protecting Employees from Sexualization in the Workplace

    April 2018

    by Jacqueline D. Gant

    Employers have a duty to protect employees from sexualization in the workplace by patrons and customers, even if that means removing or banning individuals with an alleged mental disability from their facilities or place of business.

    Read More +

    Protection from Patrons: Protecting Employees from Sexualization in the Workplace
  • Protection from Patrons: Protecting Employees from Sexualization in the Workplace

    April 2018

    by Jacqueline D. Gant

    Employers have a duty to protect employees from sexualization in the workplace by patrons and customers, even if that means removing or banning individuals with an alleged mental disability from their facilities or place of business.

    Read More +

    Protection from Patrons: Protecting Employees from Sexualization in the Workplace
  • Law Professor’s Human Rights Complaint Against University of British Columbia Dismissed

    February 2018

    by Julie MentenMichael Wagner

    More than a year after the merits of Ms. McCue’s complaint were heard, the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has dismissed this case in its entirety. The 300+ page decision contains important discussion about various topics including the Tribunal’s jurisdiction, prima facie discrimination, workplace accommodation, cultural obligations, complainant obligations, and the duty to inquire.

    Read More +

    Law Professor’s Human Rights Complaint Against University of British Columbia Dismissed
  • Are Your Bullying and Harassment Policies and Procedures in Good Shape?

    February 2018

    by Danny Bernstein

    It seems like every day a new story surfaces about allegations of sexual harassment against Hollywood elites and other celebrities. Each time, the online world erupts and anyone with a computer can have their say.  Reputations can be destroyed in hours.

    Read More +

    Are Your Bullying and Harassment Policies and Procedures in Good Shape?
  • Settling Human Rights Complaints – What Not To Do

    January 2018

    by Julia Bell

    When an employee makes a human rights complaint to the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal, the employee and the employer are permitted and even encouraged to settle such complaints. In some cases, complainants may agree to a settlement and then pursue the complaint anyway.  In these circumstances, the Tribunal retains jurisdiction to hear the complaint if it determines that it would further the purposes of the B.C. Human Rights Code to do so.  Such was the case in The Employee v. The Company and the Owner, 2017 BCHRT 266.

    Read More +

    Settling Human Rights Complaints – What Not To Do
  • The Scope of Human Rights in the Modern Workplace

    December 2017

    by Sandra Guarascio

    At a time when the #metoo movement continues to galvanize, the Supreme Court of Canada has issued a landmark decision in British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal v. Schrenk, 2017 SCC 62 that expands protection from discrimination in the workplace so that it now can potentially include within its scope harassment perpetrated by co-workers, even if they have different employers.

    Read More +

    The Scope of Human Rights in the Modern Workplace
  • Human Rights Tribunal Confirms Employers Continue to Drive the Bus

    December 2017

    by Mike Hamata

    In Adair v. Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission (No. 2), 2017 BCHRT 147, the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal revisited what accommodation looks like in the employment context.  The key reminder for employers and counsel is that the proposed accommodation need not be perfect – when there is more than one reasonable option for accommodation, “the employer is entitled to choose among them”.

    Read More +

    Human Rights Tribunal Confirms Employers Continue to Drive the Bus
  • Which Absences Properly “Count” for Attendance Management

    December 2017

    by Delayne Sartison K.C.

    The Federal Court of Appeal recently overturned a decision of the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board (the “Board”) concerning the National Attendance Management Policy (NAMP) promulgated by Correctional Service Canada (CSC) for its unionized employees: Bodnar v. Treasury Board (Correctional Service of Canada), 2017 FCA 171.

    Read More +

    Which Absences Properly “Count” for Attendance Management
  • When Human Rights Collide . . . Take Reasonable and Practical Steps to Minimize the Harm

    October 2017

    From time to time, employers will find themselves faced with circumstances where taking steps to avoid discriminating against a customer or client under the Human Rights Code will have the unintended result of the employer discriminating against its employees.  That is the situation Victoria Taxi faced in the  B.C. Court of Appeal’s recent decision, McCreath v. Victoria Taxi (1987) Ltd.

    Read More +

    When Human Rights Collide . . . Take Reasonable and Practical Steps to Minimize the Harm
  • BC Court of Appeal Restores Human Rights Tribunal Decision to Dismiss Complaint

    October 2017

    In Francescutti v. Vancouver (City), 2017 BCCA 242, the British Columbia Court of Appeal restored a human rights tribunal decision to dismiss a complaint brought by a former City of Vancouver employee.  The decision provides useful support for the ability of a respondent to succeed on an application to dismiss a complaint, despite the presence of some conflicting facts raising issues of credibility.

    Read More +

    BC Court of Appeal Restores Human Rights Tribunal Decision to Dismiss Complaint
  • 1 6 7 8 9 10 12