Resources: Investigations
-
Toxic Work Environment and Investigation of Concern? That Still Might Not Be Enough to Warrant a Discrimination Claim
September 27, 2024
In Thomas v. Signals Design Group, 2024 BCHRT 135, the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal dismissed a complaint alleging discrimination on the basis of sex. The complainant alleged she received radically different treatment as compared to her male counterparts and had to resign from employment because of the toxic work environment.
Read More +
-
Ontario Court Decides “Private Group Chats” Can Become a Disciplinable Workplace Issue
September 4, 2024
In or around April 2020, while the Human Resources department at Metrolinx (the “Employer”) was conducting an investigation into a separate and unrelated matter, an employee informed the Employer about a WhatsApp conversation between the five grievors approximately eight months earlier, a conversation which “contained negative, derogatory and sexist comments about a female employee”.
Read More +
-
COVID-19-Related Misconduct is Nothing to Sneeze At
July 29, 2021
In a decision issued on May 10, 2021[1], Arbitrator Paul Love dismissed a discipline grievance related to COVID-19-related misconduct. The discipline was issued at a time when, in the words of the arbitrator, “there was a dearth of arbitral jurisprudence” with respect to such misconduct.
Read More +
-
Employee Reinstated Despite “Ongoing Pattern of Disrespect” for Employer’s COVID-19 Safety Protocols
March 2021
Previously printed in the LexisNexis Labour Notes Newsletter.
In the recent decision of Trillium Health Partners v. CUPE, Loc. 5180, 2021 CanLII 127 (Jesin), an Ontario arbitrator, Norm Jesin, reinstated an employee to employment after he was suspended and subsequently discharged for failing to adhere to the employer’s COVID-19 safety protocols.
Read More +
-
Ontario Court of Appeal Finds School Board Breached Section 8 of the Charter When Disciplining Grievors for Personal Document Left Open on School Computer
May 15, 2023
In Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario v. York Region District School Board, 2022 ONCA 476, the Ontario Court of Appeal held that a school principal and the school board for which he worked had breached the employee right to be free of unreasonable search and seizure under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the “Charter”) when the principal went through a teacher’s personal document on a school laptop.
Read More +
-
Is This Thing On?: Surreptitious Recording Can Constitute Just Cause for Dismissal
March 17, 2022
Your employee places their cellphone on the table as they sit down for the meeting, angling it slightly towards you. You wonder – is this meeting being recorded?
The ubiquity of cellphones means that HR professionals should assume all conversations with employees are being recorded. But are there any consequences for employees who secretly record conversations with colleagues?
Read More +
-
Insolence, Insubordination and After-Acquired Evidence of Just Cause
March 11, 2022
On November 9, 2021, the B.C. Supreme Court released its decision in the case of Golob v. Fort St. John (City), 2021 BCSC 2192.
The case concerned a wrongful dismissal claim against the City of Fort St. John by its former Deputy Fire Chief.
Read More +
-
Clarification to Law of Employee Surveillance
March 2, 2022
Elevator law, according to one colleague and despite our best attempts to intervene, has its ups and downs. It has a unique set of characteristics, including its own elevator union (the International Union of Elevator Constructors (IUEC)), industry-specific collective agreements and a workforce of largely independent technicians.
Read More +
-
Taking Away Important Responsibilities for Misconduct: Arbitrator Substitutes Permanent Disciplinary Demotion for Discharge
February 18, 2022
When considering potential discipline for poor performance, a novel labour arbitration decision suggests a demotion – a permanent disciplinary demotion – may be an appropriate response.
Read More +
-
No More Tolerance for Covert Discrimination
January 11, 2022
Cybulsky v. Hamilton Health Sciences, [2021] O.H.R.T.D. No. 209 (Letheren) is a boundary-pushing case that shows a growing intolerance for sex or gender discrimination in the workplace, including covert sex or gender discrimination.
Read More +