Resources

Employee’s Damages Owed to Former Employer Significantly Reduced

In Consbec Inc. v. Walker, 2016 BCCA 114, the B.C. Court of Appeal significantly reduced the amount of damages owed by Peter Walker to his former employer, Consbec Inc., and provided valuable insight into the steps which must be taken by employers in order to justify damages claims against former employees.

Read More +

Is that “Confidential” Investigation Report actually Confidential?

If not set up properly, that “confidential” investigation report may not be so confidential after all. An Ontario arbitrator has ruled that an investigation report prepared by a lawyer is not covered by solicitor-client or litigation privilege as a matter of right. In Durham Regional Police Association v Durham Regional Police Services Board, the arbitrator ordered production of an investigation report to the union which was dissatisfied with the employer’s handling of a harassment situation.

Read More +

Back to Mitigation Basics: A Must-Read for Anyone Prosecuting or Defending a Wrongful Dismissal Action

In the recent case of Steinebach v. Clean Energy Compression Corp., 2016 BCCA 112, the B.C. Court of Appeal provided an excellent overview of first principles when it comes to an employee’s duty to take reasonable steps in mitigation of damage or loss flowing out of termination of employment.

Read More +

Trinity Western University Graduate “Religiously Harassed” and Denied Job due to Religious Beliefs

In Paquette v. Amaruk Wilderness and another (No. 4), a Trinity Western University (“TWU”) graduate was awarded over $8,500 by the B.C.H.R.T because of a company’s refusal to hire her due, in part, to her religious beliefs. The employer, Amaruk Wilderness, didn’t agree with some of the beliefs contained in TWU’s “Community Covenant”. Amaruk made its disagreement clear in a series of e-mail messages to Ms. Paquette and its actions were found to be discriminatory.

Read More +

When Will Inadequate Performance Provide Just Cause to Dismiss a “Senior Manager”?

An Ontario court recently awarded a dismissed employee wrongful dismissal damages in spite of findings to the effect that the high-level employee had persistently failed to satisfy the employer’s reasonable performance standards and had also been provided with repeated warnings and resources to assist him in meeting those standards.

Read More +

Employer’s Inaccurate Statement About Benefits Eligibility Results in Over $90,000 in Damages

In Feldstein v. 364 Northern Development Corp., [2016] B.C.J. No. 128 (S.C.), a misstatement by a manager regarding eligibility requirements for long-term disability (LTD) benefits was found to be negligent and the employer (“364”) was required to pay an employee who relied on that misstatement over $90,000 in damages.

Read More +

Possible Changes to Tax Treatment of Stock Options

A stock option plan provides an employee of a corporation with the right to purchase shares of the corporation at a pre-determined exercise price. To the extent the stock option is exercised and the exercise price is less than the fair market value of the share at the time of exercise, the employee realizes an employment benefit.

Read More +

Doctor Who? Complainant Cannot Generally Rely on Self-Diagnosis When Trying to Establish an Invisible Disability

A recent decision of the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal, Cummings v. Nenan Dane Zaa Deh Zona Family Services Society, demonstrates that a complainant cannot rely as a general matter on a self-diagnosis when trying to establish a mental disability or a disability that is not self-evident. Objective, credible medical evidence is generally required.

Read More +

Aggravated Damages in Wrongful Dismissal Claims

Two recent B.C. court cases illustrate the type of evidence employees will need to produce to establish a claim for aggravated damages related to the termination of their employment.

In Honda Canada Inc. v. Keays, the Supreme Court of Canada affirmed the ability of employees to seek aggravated damages in addition to pay in lieu of termination notice (common law or contractual).

Read More +

Employers Not Obligated to Accommodate Personal Choices – Including Breastfeeding

The right to breastfeed in public has made headlines of late, but the Federal Court of Appeal’s decision in Flatt v. Attorney General of Canada, 2015 FCA 250 makes it clear that choosing to breastfeed in most instances is just that – a choice, and not one that will necessarily be protected by human rights legislation in the context of work obligations.

Read More +