Roper Greyell Welcomes New Associate, Jacqueline D. Gant

August 2017

We are pleased to welcome Jacqueline Gant to the firm.

Jacqueline received her Bachelor of Arts degree from Simon Fraser University, where she was the captain of the varsity soccer team, and her Juris Doctor from the University of Victoria.

Since her call to the bar in 2015, Jacqueline has been advising employers concerning the management of workplace issues in both union and non-union environments, including discipline and discharge cases, collective agreement interpretation, accommodation issues and policy grievances. She has acted for clients in various industries, including mining, technology, post-secondary institutions and municipalities.

Prior to joining Roper Greyell, Jacqueline articled and practised at a large national firm in Vancouver.

Who’s Who Legal: Canada 2017 Highlights Seven Roper Greyell Lawyers

July 2017

We are pleased to announce that seven Roper Greyell lawyers have been ranked in the 2017 edition of Who’s Who Legal: Canada.

Meet our lawyers who have been recognized for their expertise:

Thomas A Roper Q.C.
Gregory J Heywood
Delayne Sartison Q.C.
Michael Wagner
Sandra Guarascio
Gavin Marshall
James D Kondopulos

Click here to view the complete list of Who’s Who Legal: Canada 2017.

About Who’s Who Legal

Since 1996, Who’s Who Legal has identified the foremost legal practitioners in business law based upon comprehensive, independent research. It is impossible to buy entry into this publication.

The Lawyer’s Daily – B.C. Court Restores Human Rights Tribunal Decision in Dismissal of City Worker

June 2017

Gabrielle Scorer comments on the British Columbia Court of Appeal’s decision to restore the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal’s decision re: Francescutti v. Vancouver (City).

Read complete article here.

 

 

Ten Roper Greyell Lawyers Ranked in 2017 Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory

May 2017

We are pleased to announce that ten of the firm’s lawyers were recognized by Lexpert as leading employment and labour law practitioners in the 2017 Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory.

Join us in congratulating the following Roper Greyell lawyers:

*Lawyer listed for the first time in The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory

For the complete directory, click here

About the Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory

Published since 1997, the annual Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory profiles leading practitioners across Canada in over 60 practice areas and leading law firms in over 40 practice areas.

 

Employer Obligations on General Voting Day: 2017 Provincial General Election

April 2017

A Provincial General Election is scheduled to take place in British Columbia on Tuesday, May 9, 2017.

The B.C. Election Act imposes certain obligations on employers to ensure that their employees have sufficient time free from work to exercise their right to vote.

We are publishing this bulletin to help employers understand the scope of their obligations on General Voting Day.

Who can vote in the Provincial General Election?

All Canadian citizens who are at least 18 years old on General Voting Day and have lived in B.C. for six months before election day are eligible to vote in the Provincial General Election.

When are polling stations open on General Voting Day?

Polling stations are open from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. PT.

Time off for Voting

Section 74 of the Election Act outlines an employer’s obligations to provide time off for voting. Of particular significance, employers must provide their employees:

  • Four consecutive hours off work. Employees eligible to vote are entitled to four consecutive hours free from work during voting hours on General Voting Day – i.e. between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. PT.
  • Without loss of pay or penalty. An employer may not make any deduction from an employee’s pay or impose any other penalty because he or she took time off to vote. Employees are entitled to their regular compensation for hours not worked because of voting.
  • At a time scheduled by the employer. While an employer must provide its employees with time off work, the employer can choose in its discretion when to provide the four consecutive hours for voting.

Example:

Sam and Toby both work on General Voting Day. Polling stations are open from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. PT

Sam works from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. The employer must let Sam do one of the following:

  • Start late – 12:00 p.m. or later
  • Leave early – 4:00 p.m. or earlier
  • Take four consecutive hours off work during his scheduled hours

Irrespective of when Sam takes time off for voting, he is entitled to his regular compensation for his full shift

Toby works from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Toby is not entitled to any time off work because he has four consecutive hours free from work for voting – 4:00 to 8:00 p.m.

Employers Operating in a Unionized Environment

Any employer operating in a unionized environment is advised to review all provisions of the applicable collective agreement which speak to obligations on General Voting Day. The employer may have obligations over and above the statutory obligations set out in the Election Act.

Employees Working in a Remote Location

The right to have four consecutive hours off work on General Voting Day without any loss of pay or penalty is not a right available to all employees. An employee who is in a remote location by reason of employment such that he or she would be unable to reasonably reach any voting place during voting hours is not entitled to time off for voting.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

The consequences for an employer of failing to grant time off work for voting can be significant. Failure to comply with section 74 of the Election Act is an offence and, on conviction, the employer may be liable to one or both of the following: a fine of up to $10,000 or imprisonment for a term not longer than one year.

Advance Voting

Any employer anticipating a disruption to its business on General Voting Day can encourage its employees to vote in advance voting. This will be available throughout B.C. from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. (local time) on April 29 and 30 and May 3, 4, 5 and 6, 2017. The employer cannot compel its employees to vote on those voting days.

If you have any question at all about how the Provincial General Election may affect you or your workplace, please contact Tamara or James or any other lawyer at Roper Greyell LLP.

Federal Government Tables Legislation to Legalize Recreational Marijuana

April 2017

The federal government tabled legislation today, April 13, 2017, that would legalize the use of marijuana for recreational purposes by July 1, 2018.

Under the new legislative regime, the federal government will license marijuana producers, while the provinces and territories will have jurisdiction over the distribution and sale of marijuana within the framework set out in the federal legislation.

Highlights of the proposed legislation are as follows:

  • Purchasers will be required to be at least 18 years old, although provinces and territories may set a higher minimum age.
  • Adults 18 and older will be able to possess up to 30 grams of dried cannabis, or its equivalent in non-dried form, and will be able to grow up to four plants per residence.
  • Possession, production, and distribution outside of the legalized system would remain illegal, as would imports or exports without a federal permit.

As part of this major legislative initiative, the federal government is also proposing a number of changes to the Criminal Code, including creating a new criminal offence with a maximum of 14 years in jail for selling marijuana to a minor.

The proposed legislation also includes significant changes to Canada’s impaired driving laws. Proposed amendments to the Criminal Code would reportedly make it illegal for a person to drive within two hours of having a prescribed level of marijuana in his or her blood stream. The government is promising a system of mandatory roadside testing to test for cannabis impairment. The government is also proposing a new drug-impaired driving offence for drivers who combine alcohol with cannabis.

Potential Implications for Employers

In advance of the proposed legalization of marijuana, employers should consider updating their drug and alcohol policies. In particular, the proposed amendments to the Criminal Code may provide employers with an evidence-based model for managing suspected impairment in the workplace.

We will be carefully following the proposed legislation as it passes its way through the House of Commons and Senate.

If you require assistance regarding the impact of these proposed legislative changes on your workplace or any workplace policies or benefit plans, please contact us.

Roper Greyell Welcomes Maggie Campbell and Mike Hamata

April 2017

We are pleased to welcome Maggie Campbell and Mike Hamata to the firm.

For the past ten years, Maggie has advised clients on all aspects of employment relations. She has represented clients before the British Columbia courts, the Human Rights Tribunal and the Employment Standards Tribunal. Before joining Roper Greyell, Maggie practiced employment and labour law at the Vancouver office of an international firm.

Mike received his Juris Doctor from the University of Toronto and was called to the British Columbia bar in 2012. Prior to starting his legal career, Mike was a judicial law clerk to the Supreme Court of British Columbia. Mike articled and practiced as an employment and labour associate at an international law firm in Vancouver before joining Roper Greyell.

“We are very excited to welcome Maggie and Mike to Roper Greyell. They bring top-tier experience that will benefit our clients and contribute to the strength of our firm,” said Tom Roper, Roper Greyell’s Chair.

Federal Government to Make EI Parental Benefits More Flexible for Parents

April 2017

How Will This Affect Employers?

The Federal government is expected to introduce extended parental leave as early as 2018. Budget 2017 proposes changes to the Employment Insurance (“EI”) scheme that will allow parents to “stretch” EI parental benefits over an extended period of up to 18 months at a lower benefit rate of 33% of average weekly earnings. EI parental benefits will continue to be available at the existing benefit rate of 55% over a period of up to 12 months.

While the total benefit amount available through EI will not change, the lower extended parental benefit rate may have an impact on employers who offer supplemental or top-up payments during parental leave. We recommend that employers start to review their policies and collective agreements to determine whether changes will be required and how they may allocate top-up payments over 18 months if required to do so. Changes to these plans will require enough lead time to give notice to employees and/or negotiate the terms of any collective agreement with unions.

Budget 2017 also proposes to allow mothers to claim EI maternity benefits up to 12 weeks before their due date, an increase from the current standard of eight weeks.

It is important to note that none of the proposed measures will take effect immediately, but must await the introduction and passage of legislation. To implement these measures, Budget 2017 proposes to amend the Employment Insurance Act.

Further, while the proposed changes to the Employment Insurance Act will extend benefit entitlement and allow mothers to begin their EI maternity benefit earlier, the changes will not necessarily alter the legislated length of pregnancy/parental leave for all employees.

The budget indicates that the federal government will make the necessary amendments to the Canada Labour Code to ensure that employees in the federally-regulated sector have job protection while they are receiving caregiving, parental or maternity leave benefits. For provincially regulated employees, the job protection and leave entitlements will remain the same (i.e. usually based on a standard 12 month leave) unless the provincial legislatures also change the applicable provincial employment standards legislation. There is precedent for the provinces to follow the Federal Government’s lead when EI changes are made, but it remains to be seen what each province will do in these circumstances.

We will continue to watch for these legislative changes as each jurisdiction takes or does not take steps towards these amendments. If you require assistance regarding the impact of these proposed legislative changes on your workplace or any workplace policies or benefit plans, please contact us.

Click here for more details

Roper Greyell is Ranked in the 2017 Edition of Chambers Global

March 2017

We are pleased to announce that Roper Greyell has once again been ranked as a leading employment and labour law firm in the 2017 edition of Chambers Global. Thomas A. Roper, Q.C., Delayne Sartison, Q.C. and Gregory Heywood were also ranked individually.

Meet our lawyers who have been recognized as leaders in employment and labour law:

Thomas A. Roper, Q.C.’s “reputation in Vancouver and beyond is of the highest standing. He is highly thought of for his far-reaching experience in employment and labour law.” One source commented: “He is very efficient and very sound in his approach – a leading lawyer.”

Delayne Sartison, Q.C. “inspires confidence in peers and clients alike, who pinpoint her as “a clear leader” in British Columbia. Commentators appreciate her expertise in matters relating to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, her strong management of arbitration files, as well as her generally thoughtful and practical attitude.”

Gregory Heywood “earns praise for his skills in litigation and arbitration, and for his flexible approach. Sources describe him as “top-notch,” and say: “He understands the industrial relations climate in BC.” He has significant experience representing natural resources and forestry industry clients.”

All quotes are from Chambers Global 2017.

About Chambers Global

Chambers Global is a well-respected legal publication that ranks the world’s best lawyers and law firms. Rankings are based on in-depth research and interviews conducted by over 150 highly qualified researchers.

Marijuana Legalization and the Workplace

March 2017

Julie Menten discusses employer safety concerns and legalized marijuana in the workplace.

Read more here.

1 16 17 18 19 20 23